Influence Of Financial Audit Findings, Governments Wealth, Size Of Government And Leverage On The Performance Of Regency/City Governments In Indonesia

Authors

  • Andri Nugraha Universitas Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/ijafibs.v9i2.13

Keywords:

BPK Audit Findings, Governments Wealth, Size Of Government Leverage, Government Performance

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of BPK audit findings, government's wealth, size of government as well as leverage on the performance of local government districts / cities in Indonesia. The analytical method used is descriptive analysis, Classical Assumption Test, Multiple Linear Regression Analysis, Testing Hypothesis, and the coefficient of determination. This study examined the relationship between BPK audit findings with the performance of local governments, government's wealth with local government performance, size of government with local government performance, as well as leverage the performance of local governments. The population in this study are all local government districts / cities in Indonesia, the sample in this study were 47 local government districts / cities in Indonesia. The type of data in this research is secondary data. The selection of the sampling method is a purposive sampling method. And data processing using SPSS software. The results contained in this research is the BPK audit findings and leverage partially no significant effect on the performance of the district / city in Indonesia. While the government's negative wealth effect and the size of government has positive influence on the performance of the government. And other results are BPK audit findings, government's wealth, size of government as well as leverage together have a significant influence on the financial performance of the district / city in Indonesia.

References

Abdullah, Syukriy dan J.A. Asmara. 2006. Perilaku Oportunistik Legislatif dalam Penganggaran Daerah: Bukti Empiris atas Aplikasi Agency Theory di Sektor Publik. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi Padang, 23-26 Agustus 2006.

Adi, Priyo Hari. 2006, Hubungan Antara Pertumbuhan Ekonomi, Belanja Pembangunan dan Pendapatan Asli Daerah. Proceddding Simposium Nasional Akuntansi IX, Padang.

Arens, Alvin A. (2008). Auditing and assurace services: an intergated approach.Ed.12th. Pearson Education: USA.

Azhar, Susanto. 2008. Sistem Informasi Akuntansi, Struktur Pengendalian Resiko Pengembangan, Edisi Perdana, Bandung: Lingga Jaya.

Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester 1 Tahun 2014. http://www.bpk.go.id

Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester 2 Tahun 2014. http://www.bpk.go.id

Bastian, I. 2001. Akuntansi Sektor Publik di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: BPFE. 2006.Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Bhinadi, Ardhito. 2003. Disparitas Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Jawa dengan Luar Pulau Jawa. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan Vol. 8 No. 1: 39-48. Juni 2003.

Chow, C.W., Ganulin, D., Haddad, K. and Williamson, J. 1998. The balanced scorecard: a potent tool for energizing and focusing health-care organization management. Journal of Health-care Management.

Damanpour, F. 1991. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34: 555 590.

Daulay, Murni. 2010. Metode Penelitian Ekonomi. Medan: USU Press.

Doyle, J., Weili Ge dan Sarah McVay, 2006. Determinants of Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics. www.elsevier.com.

Erlina, 2008, Metode Penelitian Bisnis untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen, Cetakan Pertama. Medan: usu Press

Fitriyanti, Ismi Rizky dan Pratolo, Suryo. 2009. Pengaruh Pendapatan Asli Daerah dan Belanja Pembangunan Terhadap Rasio Kemandirian dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi. Penelitian keuangan akuntansi sektor publik II Badan Litbang Departemen dalam Negeri, Bidakara, 2-3 Juni 2009.

Ghozali, Imam. 2011. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Greiling, Dorothea. 2005. Performance Measurement in The Public Sector: The German Experience. Emerald Research, Vol. 54: 551-567.

Halachmi, Arie. 2005. Performance measurement is only one way of managing performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. Vol. 54: 502-516.

Halim, Abdul. 2004. Akuntansi Sektor Publik: Akuntansi Keuangan Daerah. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Hamzah, Ardi. 2008. Analisa Kinerja Keuangan Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi, Pengangguran, Dan Kemiskinan: Pendekatan Analisis Jalur (Studi Pada 29 Kabupaten Dan 9 Kota Di Propinsi Jawa Timur Periode 2001 – 2006) Simposium nasional akuntansi 11.

Handra, Hefrizal dan Maryati, Sri. 2009. Analisis Pendapatan Asli Daerah (PAD) Bukan Pajak Pemerintah Propinsi Sumatra Barat. Konferensi Penelitian Keuangan Sektor Publik II Badan Litbang Departemen Dalam Negeri.

Jensen, Michael C., William H. Mecling, 1976, Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, The Journal of Financial Economics

Kuncoro, Mudrajad. 2004. Otonomi dan Pembangunan Daerah Reformasi, Perencanaan, Strategi dan Peluang. Jakarta. Erlangga.

Kusumawardani. 2012. Pengaruh Karakteristik Daerah (size, Kemakmuran, ukuran, legislatif, leverage) Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah. Accounting Analysis Journal 1. Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Mardiasmo. 2004. Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Minarsih, Ratna Ayu. 2015. Pengaruh Size, Wealth, Leverage Dan Intergovernmental Revenue Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Di Jawa Tengah. Skripsi. Universitas Negeri Semarang. Semarang.

Nordiawan, Deddi dan Hertianti, Ayuningtyas. 2011. Akuntansi Sektor Publik.Salemba Empat. Jakarta.

Patrick, P. A. 2007. The Determinant of Organizational Inovativeness: The Adoption of GASB 34 in Pennsylvania Local Government. Dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University. Pennsylvania.

Rukmana, Wan Widi. 2013. Pengaruh Pajak Daerah, Retribusi Daerah dan Dana Perimbangan Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Provinsi Kepulauan Riau.Jurnal Fakultas Ekonomi. Universitas Maritim Raja Ali

Sugiyono, 2006. Statistika untuk Penelitian, cetakan kesembilan, Alfa Beta, Bandung.

Suhardjanto, D, Rusmin, Mandasari, Putriesti and Brown, Alistair. 2010. Mandatory Disclosure Compliance and Local Government Charactheristics: Evidence from Indonesian Municipalities. Journal Public Policy January 2010

Sumarjo, Hendro. 2010. Pengaruh Karakteristik Pemerintah Daerah terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah. Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Sebelas Maret. Surakarta.

Suyono. 2010. Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah. Tesis. Surakarta: Fakultas Ekonomi. Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Syafitri, Febriyani. 2012. Analisis Pengaruh Karakteristik Pemerintah Daerah terhadap Tingkat Pengungkapan Laporan Keuangan. Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia. Depok.

Westin, Susan S. 1998. Performance Measuremnt and Evaluation Definition and Relationship. GAO issued May 2005

Wood, L. 1998. Local Government Dollars & Sense (Rancho Palos Verdes, CA: Training Shoppe).

Downloads

Published

2021-09-30

How to Cite

Nugraha, A. . (2021). Influence Of Financial Audit Findings, Governments Wealth, Size Of Government And Leverage On The Performance Of Regency/City Governments In Indonesia. International Journal of Applied Finance and Business Studies, 9(2), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.35335/ijafibs.v9i2.13